SubscribersHow many subscribers the channel has now. The wave shows subscribers at each point of the period. The change is against the start of the period.150.0 %+0 for the period
ViewsHow many views the posts published in the period have now. These are not views per day: MAX does not report how many views there were yesterday. The percentage is the change in the daily average: the current period is still running (today is not over yet), so it is compared with the previous one by pace rather than by total. “Was” is the whole previous period of the same length.15▼ 72.4 %was 63
ReactionsHow many reactions the posts published in the period have. The percentage is the change in the daily average: the current period is still running (today is not over yet), so it is compared with the previous one by pace rather than by total. “Was” is the whole previous period of the same length.3▼ 30.4 %was 5
MentionsHow many times other channels mentioned the channel: links and reposts, excluding advertising posts. The bigger the circle, the more mentions at that point of the period. The percentage is the change in the daily average: the current period is still running (today is not over yet), so it is compared with the previous one by pace rather than by total. “Was” is the whole previous period of the same length.61▼ 17.1 %was 76with a subscription
RepostsHow many times other channels reposted this channel's posts (excluding advertising posts). Reposts are also counted as mentions. The percentage is the change in the daily average: the current period is still running (today is not over yet), so it is compared with the previous one by pace rather than by total. “Was” is the whole previous period of the same length.28▲ 15.7 %was 25after signing in
Average post reachHow many views one post gets on average. Only posts older than two days are counted: views of fresh posts are still growing. Points with fresh posts are dashed with hollow dots: the reach of all posts right now, it will still grow.5 497▲ 4.2 %was 5 274after signing in
ERRWhat share of subscribers sees an average post: average reach ÷ subscribers × 100 %. The line shows ERR at each point of the period, the dashed line — ERR of the previous period of the same length. Points with posts younger than two days are hollow dots on the dashed end of the line.28.6 %▲ 0.7 ppdashed line — was 27.9 %after signing in
Engagement ERHow often readers react to posts: reactions ÷ views × 100 %. The tick on the bar is the previous period.2.87 %▼ 0.2 pp
Posts per dayHow many posts are published per day on average. Each cell is a point of the period: the darker, the more posts per day. The percentage is the change in the daily average: the current period is still running (today is not over yet), so it is compared with the previous one by pace rather than by total. “Was” is the whole previous period of the same length.4.1▼ 12.9 %was 4.9after signing in
Ad shareWhat share of the period's posts looks like advertising: erid labeling, ad links and other signs. The scale shows the ad load by the quality index thresholds: up to 10 % — low, up to 25 % — moderate, up to 50 % — high, above — very high. A growing share is marked red.2.4 %▼ 2.4 pp
TrendTop — subscribers at the end of each point of the period; bottom — growth per point: green means more subscribers, red means fewer. Above the growth chart — the biggest gain and the biggest loss. MAX does not report how many people subscribed and unsubscribed separately.
Audience growth
0subscribers in the period
The number of subscribers did not change in the period
Channel scoreA channel score from 0 to 100 made of five parts: audience, growth integrity, ad load, trust and calculation reliability. Each bar shows how many points the part earned out of its maximum. The index is recalculated every night; channels are compared with similar ones of the same category and size.
ReachHow many views the posts published at each point of the period have now (not views per day). The record is labeled; the point with today is paler — the day is not over yet. Average post reach — posts older than two days.
Views and reach
678 845views in the period▼ 8.9 %
Average post reach — 5 497 views (posts older than two days).
EngagementER — reactions divided by views, in percent — for the posts of each point of the period. The dashed line is ER for the whole period. The change is in percentage points against the previous period of the same length.
CitationsThe citation index (CI) shows how often and by which channels this channel is mentioned over the last 30 days, excluding advertising posts. The level is its place among similar channels. The line shows CI at each point of the period (for a week or month — the average over its days).
The citation index has not been calculated yet: it will appear after the nightly calculation once other channels mention the channel.
RhythmHow many posts are published on average in each hour of each weekday, Moscow time: the darker the cell, the more posts. “Best time” — the hours when posts older than two days have the highest average reach.
When and how much it posts
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
036912151821
Best time:09:0018:00hours when posts get the highest average reach
FormatsWhat the feed is made of. Each post has one format, by priority: repost, video, photo, link, text. The bar and percentages show the share of posts of each format; on the right — average reach of one post of the format (posts older than two days), the small bar compares it with the most viewed format.
Post formats
100 posts
Reposts99 %6 168
Video2121 %7 513
Photos3838 %5 699
Links1212 %5 239
Text2020 %7 626
On the right — average reach of one post of the format.
PostsEach dot is a post in the period: horizontally — publication date, vertically — views, dot size — reactions, color — format. This shows hits, flops and how reach changes. For large channels, the 100 most viewed posts and an even sample of the rest are shown — no more than 1,500 dots.
Every post is a dot
Higher means more views, bigger means more reactions. Click a dot to open the post.
VideoPhotosOthersize — reactionsZoom with the + and − buttons, a pinch or Ctrl + mouse wheel; drag a zoomed chart to move it
SummaryTotals for the selected period: how many posts were published, how many views and reactions they have now and the average post reach. Views are the current views of posts published on those days, not views per day. The change is against the same span before the period, if statistics cover it.
Period totals
Click a metric to see it across the period below
Viewstoday — the day is not over yetPoints with posts younger than two days are pale and dashed: their views are still growing.
AdsWhat share of the period's posts looks like advertising: erid labeling, ad links and other signs. The detector is cautious, so the real share is usually higher. The scale shows the ad load by the quality index thresholds. Below — the average reach of an ad post and a regular post, and who the channel advertises (sites that ad links lead to).
What worksPosts of the period with the most views. The bar shows views relative to first place. The preview is the post's image; for a post without an image — the channel avatar. Views are the post's current count.
RhythmHow many posts were published each day of the period (pale bars) and the 7-day average (line): you can see whether the channel is speeding up or slowing down. Today is not over yet, so its average is calculated up to yesterday.
Posts by day
Pale bars are days, the line is the 7-day average: you can see whether the channel is speeding up or slowing down
Posts per day7-day average
Data updated at 00:46 Moscow time. Views are the current counts of posts published on those days; average reach counts posts older than two days.
How the quality index is calculated
Уже несколько дней моему сыну, поступившему в ВУЗ, приходит смс о том, что ему якобы на сайте повесток пришла повестка. И ссылка на сайт. Естественно, в сентябре встал на воинский учёт в учебном заведении. А уже специалисты вуза должны были подать данные в военкомат. Мы сами с ним со справкой ходили, и нам там доступно объяснили, как проходит процедура. Естественно, сын на сообщения не реагирует, а ему все приходят и приходят смски, то от сервиса повесток, то от госуслуг, то от военкомата... Конечно же он уже проинформирован 200 раз, но и вам на всякий случай будет полезно напомнить, подскажите своим детям, ни в коем случае не проходить по ссылкам. Проще сходить в военкомат и узнать.
Труд создал человека… или как Валеру спустили с пальмы 🐒
Тут недавно мы с мужем зацепились языками за тему эволюции. Вообще, интерес к истории у нас давний: еще в начале 2000-х мы активно увлекались истоками славянства, альтернативной историей, засматривались роликами и зачитывались статьями, где недвусмысленно намекалось, что теория Дарвина — мягко скажем, не единственная правда на свете.
И вот недавно Валера наткнулся на очередное видео в сети и вспомнил историю из своего детства. Вообще, спасибо ему: муж у меня — регулярный поставщик контента! И правильно, моё-то детство не было настолько бурным, чтобы снабжать блог байками день за днём.
Дело было примерно в шестом классе, на уроке русского языка. Шел 1976 год. Детям задали сочинение на классическую тему: «Как труд создал человека».
Понятно дело, чего ждал учитель: торжественных од советскому труженику, пафоса про светлое коммунистическое будущее и правильных партийных лозунгов. Но маленький Валерочка был пытливым мальчиком. Буквально накануне он посмотрел передачу «Очевидное — невероятное», где профессор Сергей Капица (кстати, в свое время, на 10 лет позже, я тоже смотрела эти передачи) рассказывал о теории Дарвина. Оттуда-то мальчик и почерпнул свежую научную мысль, что именно труд превратил обезьяну в хомо сапиенс.
Тема пришлась кстати и Валера со всей детской непосредственностью и ответственностью вылил на бумагу все потрясающие научные факты, что удалось выяснить. Более того, проявил черту чисто академической этики — прямо в начале текста оставил «ссылку на источник»: указал, что услышал это по телевизору от уважаемого профессора!
Каково же было его разочарование, когда за сочинение он получил тройку. Единственную в классе! При том что учился Валера всегда хорошо.
Естественно, спросил учителя, за что три?
И тут учитель объявляет:
— Советский человек — это высшая ступень эволюции! А ты, Мальцев, судя по всему, произошел от обезьяны.
Класс, понятное дело, покатился от смеха. От такой несправедливости и обиды Валерочка закричал сквозь слезы: «Это не я придумал, это профессор Капица по телевизору сказал! У меня нет оснований ему не верить!»
Учитель тогда смягчился, подошёл, обнял его, погладил по голове и с какой-то странной грустной ухмылкой произнес: «Ну да, ну да…»
Правда, педагогический задор это в нем не угасило, потом еще пару раз урок начинался с фразы: «Ну что, где тут у нас произошедший от обезьяны Мальцев? К доске!»
Вот я теперь думаю: а какого мнения-то был сам учитель?
С одной стороны, если советский человек произошел не от обезьяны, то его происхождение может быть только божественным? За такое и партийный билет на стол положить можно. А если его всё-таки облагородил труд… так это же чистый Дарвин!
Непонятно.
Вот так и живем: то ли мы высший разум, то ли просто очень трудолюбивые приматы.
Так от куда мы появились то? Как считаете, что из нас человека делает? 😉
Necessary cookies keep the site working and secure: sign-in, form protection, language, theme and others. Yandex Metrica analytics cookies and Yandex Advertising Network ad cookies are enabled only with your consent. By clicking “Accept all” you give consent to processing of cookie data; see the Personal Data Processing Policy for details.
Russia
