SubscribersHow many subscribers the channel has now. The wave shows subscribers at each point of the period. The change is against the start of the period.340.0 %+0 for the period
ViewsHow many views the posts published in the period have now. These are not views per day: MAX does not report how many views there were yesterday. The percentage is the change in the daily average: the current period is still running (today is not over yet), so it is compared with the previous one by pace rather than by total. “Was” is the whole previous period of the same length.102▼ 38.5 %was 168
ReactionsHow many reactions the posts published in the period have. The percentage is the change in the daily average: the current period is still running (today is not over yet), so it is compared with the previous one by pace rather than by total. “Was” is the whole previous period of the same length.21▼ 18.2 %was 26
MentionsHow many times other channels mentioned the channel: links and reposts, excluding advertising posts. The bigger the circle, the more mentions at that point of the period. The percentage is the change in the daily average: the current period is still running (today is not over yet), so it is compared with the previous one by pace rather than by total. “Was” is the whole previous period of the same length.61▼ 19.5 %was 76with a subscription
RepostsHow many times other channels reposted this channel's posts (excluding advertising posts). Reposts are also counted as mentions. The percentage is the change in the daily average: the current period is still running (today is not over yet), so it is compared with the previous one by pace rather than by total. “Was” is the whole previous period of the same length.28▲ 12.3 %was 25after signing in
Average post reachHow many views one post gets on average. Only posts older than two days are counted: views of fresh posts are still growing. Points with fresh posts are dashed with hollow dots: the reach of all posts right now, it will still grow.5 497▲ 4.2 %was 5 274after signing in
ERRWhat share of subscribers sees an average post: average reach ÷ subscribers × 100 %. The line shows ERR at each point of the period, the dashed line — ERR of the previous period of the same length. Points with posts younger than two days are hollow dots on the dashed end of the line.28.6 %▲ 0.7 ppdashed line — was 27.9 %after signing in
Engagement ERHow often readers react to posts: reactions ÷ views × 100 %. The tick on the bar is the previous period.2.87 %▼ 0.2 pp
Posts per dayHow many posts are published per day on average. Each cell is a point of the period: the darker, the more posts per day. The percentage is the change in the daily average: the current period is still running (today is not over yet), so it is compared with the previous one by pace rather than by total. “Was” is the whole previous period of the same length.4.1▼ 15.5 %was 4.9after signing in
Ad shareWhat share of the period's posts looks like advertising: erid labeling, ad links and other signs. The scale shows the ad load by the quality index thresholds: up to 10 % — low, up to 25 % — moderate, up to 50 % — high, above — very high. A growing share is marked red.2.4 %▼ 2.4 pp
TrendTop — subscribers at the end of each point of the period; bottom — growth per point: green means more subscribers, red means fewer. Above the growth chart — the biggest gain and the biggest loss. MAX does not report how many people subscribed and unsubscribed separately.
Audience growth
0subscribers in the period
The number of subscribers did not change in the period
Channel scoreA channel score from 0 to 100 made of five parts: audience, growth integrity, ad load, trust and calculation reliability. Each bar shows how many points the part earned out of its maximum. The index is recalculated every night; channels are compared with similar ones of the same category and size.
ReachHow many views the posts published at each point of the period have now (not views per day). The record is labeled; the point with today is paler — the day is not over yet. Average post reach — posts older than two days.
Views and reach
678 845views in the period▼ 11.6 %
Average post reach — 5 497 views (posts older than two days).
EngagementER — reactions divided by views, in percent — for the posts of each point of the period. The dashed line is ER for the whole period. The change is in percentage points against the previous period of the same length.
CitationsThe citation index (CI) shows how often and by which channels this channel is mentioned over the last 30 days, excluding advertising posts. The level is its place among similar channels. The line shows CI at each point of the period (for a week or month — the average over its days).
The citation index has not been calculated yet: it will appear after the nightly calculation once other channels mention the channel.
RhythmHow many posts are published on average in each hour of each weekday, Moscow time: the darker the cell, the more posts. “Best time” — the hours when posts older than two days have the highest average reach.
When and how much it posts
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
036912151821
Best time:09:0018:00hours when posts get the highest average reach
FormatsWhat the feed is made of. Each post has one format, by priority: repost, video, photo, link, text. The bar and percentages show the share of posts of each format; on the right — average reach of one post of the format (posts older than two days), the small bar compares it with the most viewed format.
Post formats
100 posts
Reposts99 %6 168
Video2121 %7 513
Photos3838 %5 699
Links1212 %5 239
Text2020 %7 626
On the right — average reach of one post of the format.
PostsEach dot is a post in the period: horizontally — publication date, vertically — views, dot size — reactions, color — format. This shows hits, flops and how reach changes. For large channels, the 100 most viewed posts and an even sample of the rest are shown — no more than 1,500 dots.
Every post is a dot
Higher means more views, bigger means more reactions. Click a dot to open the post.
VideoPhotosOthersize — reactionsZoom with the + and − buttons, a pinch or Ctrl + mouse wheel; drag a zoomed chart to move it
SummaryTotals for the selected period: how many posts were published, how many views and reactions they have now and the average post reach. Views are the current views of posts published on those days, not views per day. The change is against the same span before the period, if statistics cover it.
Period totals
Click a metric to see it across the period below
Viewstoday — the day is not over yetPoints with posts younger than two days are pale and dashed: their views are still growing.
AdsWhat share of the period's posts looks like advertising: erid labeling, ad links and other signs. The detector is cautious, so the real share is usually higher. The scale shows the ad load by the quality index thresholds. Below — the average reach of an ad post and a regular post, and who the channel advertises (sites that ad links lead to).
What worksPosts of the period with the most views. The bar shows views relative to first place. The preview is the post's image; for a post without an image — the channel avatar. Views are the post's current count.
RhythmHow many posts were published each day of the period (pale bars) and the 7-day average (line): you can see whether the channel is speeding up or slowing down. Today is not over yet, so its average is calculated up to yesterday.
Posts by day
Pale bars are days, the line is the 7-day average: you can see whether the channel is speeding up or slowing down
Posts per day7-day average
Data updated at 21:57 Moscow time. Views are the current counts of posts published on those days; average reach counts posts older than two days.
How the quality index is calculated
Ученики самарского представительства международной ИТ-школы «KIBERone» вместе с родителями и преподавателями побывали в Центре развития промышленной робототехники Тесвел.
В «KIBERone» ребята учатся создавать реальные цифровые продукты - и все осваивают на практике: программирование и логику, веб-разработку, нейросети, 3D-моделирование и многое другое.
В Тесвеле ученикам показали производственную площадку, где создаются робототехнические комплексы. Сотрудники рассказали о трендах, применении РТК и последних проектах. От детей было очень много вполне взрослых вопросов - про использование, применение и программирование. Главный ответ: роботы создаются не чтобы заменить человека, а чтобы стать его помощниками на производстве.
После экскурсии прошел мастер-класс: каждый смог задать траекторию движения коллаборативного робота и запрограммировать его. Завершили визит квизом с подарками - многие захотели вернуться!
Такие визиты и сотрудничество с образовательными организациями очень важны: они помогают с профориентацией подрастающего поколения и мотивируют учиться дальше.
Задача: Для обеспечения непрерывного технологического процесса плавки асбеста при 1200 °C заводу требовался особо чистый азот (99,999%) для создания защитной азотной рубашки, предохраняющей расплав и футеровку печи от окисления. Цикл работы печей — до 80 дней без остановки. Одна азотная станция должна была снабжать две печи, что предъявляло требования к производительности и надёжности.
Решение: Специалисты Тесвел внедрили азотную станцию на базе адсорбционного генератора азота TEC.N-30. Оборудование подобрано под технологические требования заказчика.
Чистота азота: 99,999%. Режим работы: непрерывный, с длительностью цикла печи до 80 дней. Производительность: одна станция снабжает две печи.
Произведено в России. Генератор азота TEC.N-30 включён в реестр российской промышленной продукции Минпромторга, имеет сертификаты «Сделано в России» и «Сделано в Самарской области».
Результат: проект реализован в короткие сроки. Полный цикл работ, включающий изготовление, логистику и пусконаладку, занял 1,5 месяца. К моменту обращения на предприятии уже имелся парк азотного оборудования: генератор 2008 года производства и станция другого производителя. Однако их эксплуатация оказалась нецелесообразной. Стоимость капитального ремонта установки составила бы половину стоимости новой станции. В итоге заказчик остановил выбор на решении от Тесвел.
В 2025 году мировой парк промышленных роботов увеличился и достиг рекордных 5 миллионов единиц. Это стало возможным благодаря росту числа установок: за год на заводах по всему миру было установлено более 600 000 новых устройств.
Ещё одно выступление, о котором хочется рассказать: кто отвечает за успех роботизации? Ответили эксперты Тесвел
Компания Тесвел приняла участие в межрегиональном форуме «Повышение производительности труда за счет внедрения автономных систем», который прошел в пензенском технопарке высоких технологий «Рамеев». Организатор мероприятия — правительство Пензенской области.
Деловая программа была посвящена роботизации и производительности труда, применению автономных систем в реальных секторах экономики, а также беспилотным авиационным системам в контрольно-надзорной деятельности.
Директор по развитию компании Тесвел Алена Городушкина выступила с докладом «Кто отвечает за успех роботизации на производстве?». Доклад был посвящен особенностям рынка роботизации в России и выстраиванию правильного взаимодействия между заказчиком и интегратором на примере реализованных проектов компании. Также были затронуты темы повышения эффективности производства после внедрения роботизации и приведен расчет экономического эффекта для предприятий.
Как отметила Алена Городушкина, помимо роста производительности, при правильной роботизации происходит снижение брака, сокращение времени производственного цикла и снижение эксплуатационных затрат.
В форуме приняли участие представители Минпромторга России, федеральных центров компетенций, отраслевых ассоциаций и компаний в сфере автономных систем и робототехники.
Necessary cookies keep the site working and secure: sign-in, form protection, language, theme and others. Yandex Metrica analytics cookies and Yandex Advertising Network ad cookies are enabled only with your consent. By clicking “Accept all” you give consent to processing of cookie data; see the Personal Data Processing Policy for details.