Loading image…
Public channel
ID 78587900838642
Боты в МАКС | Код и логика
Разрабатываю ботов для автоматизации рутины: поддержка, заявки, статусы, согласования.
Даю прототип за 1–2 дня, прозрачную оценку до старта и документацию.
В канале — разборы ТЗ, логика сценариев, кейсы с эффектом.
Есть задача? Расскажите — дам оценку и вариант реализации.
https://fedordo.ru
The section failed to load.
Channel analytics
Dashboard
20 October — 26 October 2026
Loading…
SubscribersHow many subscribers the channel has now. The wave shows subscribers at each point of the period. The change is against the start of the period.
53
10.4 %
+5 for the period
ViewsHow many views the posts published in the period have now. These are not views per day: MAX does not report how many views there were yesterday.
118
22.9 %
was 156
ReactionsHow many reactions the posts published in the period have.
8
18.4 %
was 10
MentionsHow many times other channels mentioned the channel: links and reposts, excluding advertising posts. The bigger the circle, the more mentions at that point of the period.
with a subscription
RepostsHow many times other channels reposted this channel's posts (excluding advertising posts). Reposts are also counted as mentions.
after signing in
Average post reachHow many views one post gets on average. Only posts older than two days are counted: views of fresh posts are still growing. Points with fresh posts are dashed with hollow dots: the reach of all posts right now, it will still grow.
59
24.4 %
was 78
ERRWhat share of subscribers sees an average post: average reach ÷ subscribers × 100 %. The line shows ERR at each point of the period, the dashed line — ERR of the previous period of the same length. Points with posts younger than two days are hollow dots on the dashed end of the line.
111.3 %
51.2 pp
dashed line — was 162.5 %
Engagement ERHow often readers react to posts: reactions ÷ views × 100 %. The tick on the bar is the previous period.
6.78 %
0.4 pp
was 6.41 %
Posts per dayHow many posts are published per day on average. Each cell is a point of the period: the darker, the more posts per day.
0.3
2.0 %
was 0.3
Ad shareWhat share of the period's posts looks like advertising: erid labeling, ad links and other signs. The scale shows the ad load by the quality index thresholds: up to 10 % — low, up to 25 % — moderate, up to 50 % — high, above — very high. A growing share is marked red.
with a subscription
TrendTop — subscribers at the end of each point of the period; bottom — growth per point: green means more subscribers, red means fewer. Above the growth chart — the biggest gain and the biggest loss. MAX does not report how many people subscribed and unsubscribed separately.
Audience growth
+5subscribers in the period
+3 biggest gain · 21 Oct 2026
Channel scoreA channel score from 0 to 100 made of five parts: audience, growth integrity, ad load, trust and calculation reliability. Each bar shows how many points the part earned out of its maximum. The index is recalculated every night; channels are compared with similar ones of the same category and size.
How it is calculated
Quality index
The quality index has not been calculated yet. It appears for channels with at least 500 subscribers that post at least once a week, after a week of tracking.
ReachHow many views the posts published at each point of the period have now (not views per day). The record is labeled; the point with today is paler — the day is not over yet. Average post reach — posts older than two days.
Views and reach
118views in the period 22.9 %
Average post reach — 59 views (posts older than two days).
EngagementER — reactions divided by views, in percent — for the posts of each point of the period. The dashed line is ER for the whole period. The change is in percentage points against the previous period of the same length.
Subscriber engagement
6.78 %ER = reactions ÷ views 0.4 pp
Channel ER
average for the period
CitationsThe citation index (CI) shows how often and by which channels this channel is mentioned over the last 30 days, excluding advertising posts. The level is its place among similar channels. The line shows CI at each point of the period (for a week or month — the average over its days).
How it is calculated
Citation index
0.0citation index
lowbelow averageaverageabove averagehigh
Place among similar channels — higher than 53 %. To reach the “high” level, the channel needs to overtake 19 more channels.
#43 702 in MAX · More — the “Mentions” tab
RhythmHow many posts are published on average in each hour of each weekday, Moscow time: the darker the cell, the more posts. “Best time” — the hours when posts older than two days have the highest average reach.
When and how much it posts
FormatsWhat the feed is made of. Each post has one format, by priority: repost, video, photo, link, text. The bar and percentages show the share of posts of each format; on the right — average reach of one post of the format (posts older than two days), the small bar compares it with the most viewed format.
Post formats
PostsEach dot is a post in the period: horizontally — publication date, vertically — views, dot size — reactions, color — format. This shows hits, flops and how reach changes. For large channels, the 100 most viewed posts and an even sample of the rest are shown — no more than 1,500 dots.
Every post is a dot
Higher means more views, bigger means more reactions. Click a dot to open the post.
SummaryTotals for the selected period: how many posts were published, how many views and reactions they have now and the average post reach. Views are the current views of posts published on those days, not views per day. The change is against the same span before the period, if statistics cover it.
Period totals
Click a metric to see it across the period below
AdsWhat share of the period's posts looks like advertising: erid labeling, ad links and other signs. The detector is cautious, so the real share is usually higher. The scale shows the ad load by the quality index thresholds. Below — the average reach of an ad post and a regular post, and who the channel advertises (sites that ad links lead to).
More
Ads in the channel
What worksPosts of the period with the most views. The bar shows views relative to first place. The preview is the post's image; for a post without an image — the channel avatar. Views are the post's current count.
All posts
Top posts
By views for the period
RhythmHow many posts were published each day of the period (pale bars) and the 7-day average (line): you can see whether the channel is speeding up or slowing down. Today is not over yet, so its average is calculated up to yesterday.
Posts by day
Pale bars are days, the line is the 7-day average: you can see whether the channel is speeding up or slowing down
Posts per day
7-day average
Data updated at 20:44 Moscow time. Views are the current counts of posts published on those days; average reach counts posts older than two days. How the quality index is calculated
Posts for the period
Loading…
Loading image…
Как я сделал бота, который не ломается, когда пользователь пишет “а если…”
🤖 Бот должен быть готов к хаосу. Клиент редко пишет «по сценарию»: чаще это «а если вторник не подойдёт, можно среду?», «а у меня два вопроса сразу», «а можно без кнопки, просто текстом?». Если бот на это не рассчитан, диалог обрывается — и клиент уходит.
В одном из проектов для специалиста по консультациям я сразу закладывал «плохие» ветки: когда пользователь меняет тему, просит перенести, пишет сленгом или вообще не выбирает кнопки.
Что делал:
- Fallback на каждом шаге. Если бот не распознал действие — не молчит, а предлагает варианты: «Выберите дату кнопками или напишите “другое”».
- Перехват смены контекста. Если в середине записи человек пишет «а сколько стоит?», бот не падает, а переключается в ветку FAQ и потом возвращает к записи.
- Защита от «двойных запросов». Если пользователь нажал две кнопки подряд, система берёт последнее действие и явно фиксирует состояние.
Мини‑пример логики (псевдокод):
Боль клиента: «Люди пишут как хотят, а бот теряется — и я снова всё делаю вручную».
Эффект: бот держится даже в хаосе, конверсия в запись растёт, нагрузка на специалиста падает.
А какие «неожиданные» фразы чаще всего ломают ваших ботов? 👇
#разработкаботов #MAX #логика #fallback
🤖 Бот должен быть готов к хаосу. Клиент редко пишет «по сценарию»: чаще это «а если вторник не подойдёт, можно среду?», «а у меня два вопроса сразу», «а можно без кнопки, просто текстом?». Если бот на это не рассчитан, диалог обрывается — и клиент уходит.
В одном из проектов для специалиста по консультациям я сразу закладывал «плохие» ветки: когда пользователь меняет тему, просит перенести, пишет сленгом или вообще не выбирает кнопки.
Что делал:
- Fallback на каждом шаге. Если бот не распознал действие — не молчит, а предлагает варианты: «Выберите дату кнопками или напишите “другое”».
- Перехват смены контекста. Если в середине записи человек пишет «а сколько стоит?», бот не падает, а переключается в ветку FAQ и потом возвращает к записи.
- Защита от «двойных запросов». Если пользователь нажал две кнопки подряд, система берёт последнее действие и явно фиксирует состояние.
Мини‑пример логики (псевдокод):
if state == "choose_date":
if user_clicks_button:
save date
state = "choose_time"
send "Выберите время:"
elif user_text_matches("перенести|другое|не подходит"):
state = "reschedule_flow"
send "Хорошо, давайте подберём другой вариант. Напишите удобную дату или нажмите «Выбрать заново»."
else:
send fallback_message
# Остаёмся в том же состоянии, чтобы не потерять прогрессБоль клиента: «Люди пишут как хотят, а бот теряется — и я снова всё делаю вручную».
Эффект: бот держится даже в хаосе, конверсия в запись растёт, нагрузка на специалиста падает.
А какие «неожиданные» фразы чаще всего ломают ваших ботов? 👇
#разработкаботов #MAX #логика #fallback
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…