SubscribersHow many subscribers the channel has now. The wave shows subscribers at each point of the period. The change is against the start of the period.113▲ 0.9 %+1 for the period
ViewsHow many views the posts published in the period have now. These are not views per day: MAX does not report how many views there were yesterday. The percentage is the change in the daily average: the current period is still running (today is not over yet), so it is compared with the previous one by pace rather than by total. “Was” is the whole previous period of the same length.298▼ 15.5 %was 369
ReactionsHow many reactions the posts published in the period have. The percentage is the change in the daily average: the current period is still running (today is not over yet), so it is compared with the previous one by pace rather than by total. “Was” is the whole previous period of the same length.9▼ 37.2 %was 15
MentionsHow many times other channels mentioned the channel: links and reposts, excluding advertising posts. The bigger the circle, the more mentions at that point of the period. The percentage is the change in the daily average: the current period is still running (today is not over yet), so it is compared with the previous one by pace rather than by total. “Was” is the whole previous period of the same length.61▼ 18.9 %was 76with a subscription
RepostsHow many times other channels reposted this channel's posts (excluding advertising posts). Reposts are also counted as mentions. The percentage is the change in the daily average: the current period is still running (today is not over yet), so it is compared with the previous one by pace rather than by total. “Was” is the whole previous period of the same length.28▲ 13.2 %was 25after signing in
Average post reachHow many views one post gets on average. Only posts older than two days are counted: views of fresh posts are still growing. Points with fresh posts are dashed with hollow dots: the reach of all posts right now, it will still grow.5 535▲ 2.9 %was 5 381after signing in
ERRWhat share of subscribers sees an average post: average reach ÷ subscribers × 100 %. The line shows ERR at each point of the period, the dashed line — ERR of the previous period of the same length. Points with posts younger than two days are hollow dots on the dashed end of the line.29.0 %▲ 0.1 ppdashed line — was 28.9 %after signing in
Engagement ERHow often readers react to posts: reactions ÷ views × 100 %. The tick on the bar is the previous period.2.80 %▼ 0.2 pp
Posts per dayHow many posts are published per day on average. Each cell is a point of the period: the darker, the more posts per day. The percentage is the change in the daily average: the current period is still running (today is not over yet), so it is compared with the previous one by pace rather than by total. “Was” is the whole previous period of the same length.4.3▼ 8.2 %was 4.7after signing in
Ad shareWhat share of the period's posts looks like advertising: erid labeling, ad links and other signs. The scale shows the ad load by the quality index thresholds: up to 10 % — low, up to 25 % — moderate, up to 50 % — high, above — very high. A growing share is marked red.3.9 %▲ 1.8 pp
TrendTop — subscribers at the end of each point of the period; bottom — growth per point: green means more subscribers, red means fewer. Above the growth chart — the biggest gain and the biggest loss. MAX does not report how many people subscribed and unsubscribed separately.
Audience growth
+1subscribers in the period
+1 biggest gain · 27 Oct 2026
Channel scoreA channel score from 0 to 100 made of five parts: audience, growth integrity, ad load, trust and calculation reliability. Each bar shows how many points the part earned out of its maximum. The index is recalculated every night; channels are compared with similar ones of the same category and size.
ReachHow many views the posts published at each point of the period have now (not views per day). The record is labeled; the point with today is paler — the day is not over yet. Average post reach — posts older than two days.
Views and reach
709 891views in the period▼ 6.1 %
Average post reach — 5 535 views (posts older than two days).
EngagementER — reactions divided by views, in percent — for the posts of each point of the period. The dashed line is ER for the whole period. The change is in percentage points against the previous period of the same length.
CitationsThe citation index (CI) shows how often and by which channels this channel is mentioned over the last 30 days, excluding advertising posts. The level is its place among similar channels. The line shows CI at each point of the period (for a week or month — the average over its days).
RhythmHow many posts are published on average in each hour of each weekday, Moscow time: the darker the cell, the more posts. “Best time” — the hours when posts older than two days have the highest average reach.
When and how much it posts
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
036912151821
Best time:09:0018:00hours when posts get the highest average reach
FormatsWhat the feed is made of. Each post has one format, by priority: repost, video, photo, link, text. The bar and percentages show the share of posts of each format; on the right — average reach of one post of the format (posts older than two days), the small bar compares it with the most viewed format.
Post formats
100 posts
Reposts99 %6 168
Video2121 %7 513
Photos3838 %5 699
Links1212 %5 239
Text2020 %7 626
On the right — average reach of one post of the format.
PostsEach dot is a post in the period: horizontally — publication date, vertically — views, dot size — reactions, color — format. This shows hits, flops and how reach changes. For large channels, the 100 most viewed posts and an even sample of the rest are shown — no more than 1,500 dots.
Every post is a dot
Higher means more views, bigger means more reactions. Click a dot to open the post.
VideoPhotosOthersize — reactionsZoom with the + and − buttons, a pinch or Ctrl + mouse wheel; drag a zoomed chart to move it
SummaryTotals for the selected period: how many posts were published, how many views and reactions they have now and the average post reach. Views are the current views of posts published on those days, not views per day. The change is against the same span before the period, if statistics cover it.
Period totals
Click a metric to see it across the period below
Viewstoday — the day is not over yetPoints with posts younger than two days are pale and dashed: their views are still growing.
AdsWhat share of the period's posts looks like advertising: erid labeling, ad links and other signs. The detector is cautious, so the real share is usually higher. The scale shows the ad load by the quality index thresholds. Below — the average reach of an ad post and a regular post, and who the channel advertises (sites that ad links lead to).
What worksPosts of the period with the most views. The bar shows views relative to first place. The preview is the post's image; for a post without an image — the channel avatar. Views are the post's current count.
RhythmHow many posts were published each day of the period (pale bars) and the 7-day average (line): you can see whether the channel is speeding up or slowing down. Today is not over yet, so its average is calculated up to yesterday.
Posts by day
Pale bars are days, the line is the 7-day average: you can see whether the channel is speeding up or slowing down
Posts per day7-day average
Data updated at 16:28 Moscow time. Views are the current counts of posts published on those days; average reach counts posts older than two days.
How the quality index is calculated
К поэзии Николая Тряпкина приобщаются молодые китайские литературоведы
В эти выходные члены Комиссии по творческому наследию Николая Ивановича Тряпкина (1918–1999) посетили захоронение поэта на подмосковном кладбище Ракитки. Особенностью памятного мероприятия стало то, что впервые к собравшимся присоединился представитель Китая – молодой исследователь русской поэзии Чжоу Фаньци.
Чжоу, который для простоты общения в нашей стране выбрал себе имя Дмитрий (в честь композитора Шостаковича), учился в Институте русского языка имени Пушкина, сейчас стажируется в РГГУ под руководством известного исследователя Серебряного века, ведущего научного сотрудника ИМЛИ РАН Дины Магомедовой. В планах Чжоу написание в рамках Шанхайского университета иностранных языков (под научным руководством легендарного профессора Чжэна Тиу) диссертации о взаимоотношениях русских поэтов Серебряного века и композитора Скрябина. Кстати, как вы думаете, кто ближе всего нашему молодому китайскому другу – Блок, Есенин, Гумилёв? Оказывается, Фёдор Сологуб…
На могиле поэта принято читать стихи. После поминальной литии, которую провёл поэт Руслан Кошкин, и строк самого Николая Тряпкина, интересно было послушать что-то и из китайской поэзии. Дима прочитал на языке оригинала стихотворение классика – Вэня Тинъюня (поэт IX века). Смысл его в том, что автор, поклоняясь могиле другого поэта, с почтением просит у него поделиться с ним вдохновением…
На прощанье Дмитрию была подарена книга Тряпкина «Звёздное время», выпущенная редакцией «Литературной России». Автографы на ней тут же в автобусе по дороге с кладбища оставили составитель – поэт Григорий Шувалов, и редактор – Евгений Богачков.
Одним из самых издаваемых писателей в нашей стране вот уже два с лишним десятилетия остаётся дочка бывшего чекиста и многолетнего парторга Московской писательской организации Аркадия Васильева – Дарья Донцова. Однако как надо воспринимать её книги: как значимые художественные романы, пробуждающие в наших душах светлые чувства, или всего лишь навсего как проект развлекательного пошиба? Ответ даёт в свежем номере интернет-портала «Литературная Россия» наша верная читательница из Липецка Инна Путилина. Она, к слову, проанализировала также, как Донцова за два десятилетия изменилась и в какую сторону: лучшую или худшую. Приятно иметь дело с такой вдумчивой и дотошной читательницей.
Шокирующие цифры тут привёл владелец самого главного монополиста книжного рынка – холдинга «ЭКСМО-АСТ» Олег Новиков. Из-за дроновых атак укронацистов на складах «Вайлдберриз» за последнее время сгорели тринадцать с половиной миллионов книг. А не так ли в своё время поступали в Германии фашисты, когда бросали в костры неугодные им книги?! По сути, потомки недобитых бандеровцев повторяют преступления гитлеровцев. И за это нынешним варварам не будет прощения.
Дело даже не в финансовых потерях (а они, к слову, немалые: это порядка четырёхсот миллионов рублей). В конце концов деньги – дело наживное. Бандеровцы атаками своих беспилотников пытаются лишить нас знаний (а одним из главных источников знаний, как известно, является именно книга). Обрушиваясь на книжные склады России, они надеются тем самым перекрыть миллионам людей доступ к сокровищам мировой и русской культуры и превратить нас в манкуртов, напрочь лишённых исторической памяти, и в безграмотную толпу, неспособную построить красивое будущее. Но ничего у нынешних эсэсовцев не выйдет. Они только сами себе выроют могилу.
Хорошие, добрые полезные книги и впредь будут сопровождать нас по жизни.
У нас появился новый автор: Геннадий Опарин. В свежем номере нашего интернет-портала «Литературная Россия» он рассказывает о своих встречах с классиком советской литературы Андреем Битовым (https://litrossia.ru/item/pro-pisatelya-bitova/). Это читается на одном дыхании. Надеемся, что сегодняшнее выступление Опарина – только начало нашего сотрудничества. Опарину есть что и о чём рассказать читающему народу.
Necessary cookies keep the site working and secure: sign-in, form protection, language, theme and others. Yandex Metrica analytics cookies and Yandex Advertising Network ad cookies are enabled only with your consent. By clicking “Accept all” you give consent to processing of cookie data; see the Personal Data Processing Policy for details.